xsnero.blogg.se

This book isn't fake, it's not chinese, and it's not islamic. The structure of the handwriting, the drawings, the shape of the letters.then it hit me. When I found this page with the actual digital images I flipped through each page as if reading it and couldn't help but feel that book was familiar to me. After it was over, I started down the rabbit hole of the "VM" for short. Of course the antikythera mechanism was on it, something about a SE Asian family dynasty named the Travancores, and then this book- the Voynich Manuscript. Anyway, the video was interesting as it was about the 15 strangest discoveries of all time.

The star looking things have those strings attached to them - makes me wonder wtf? Perhaps those are flowers not stars or sometimes they are flowers sometimes they are stars.ĭuring a lull in the workday I decided to watch a youtube video that caught my attention with a picture of a giant human skeleton that had wings.yes I know it's a fake pic but I just had to investigate. The section with women in "bath tubs" and pipes are really freaky - somehow I can't decide if it's like all women hot springs or some weird women breeding laboratory. I do like how the script looks and wonder what the language is really.

There are parts that seem a bit like that's not likely (the zodiac circles for example) but again, no idea. what if I try to write a book that's in my language, with my right hand and as a reflection or something bizarre like that.Īt moments I wondered if perhaps the pictures weren't drawn by a child of the author in some sort of cute collaboration. I am no expert on Leonardo Da Vinci, but given his genius and the known works, this doesn't seem like something he would make - unless perhaps in some very odd state of mind and as an experiment e.g. So that doesn't seem too well thought out. I must again stress the shittines of execution and a little schizophrenic nature of it as there are all those pictures of plans - that had to be drawn first - then the text was added next to it and around it - however it fit. There is a degree of discrepancy between the drawings (which somehow look like a children's drawings in a way) and the script, which is quite neat and straight.Īnother thing which makes me wonder if it's Leonardo's is - would a likely gay guy spend a huge section of a possibly private notebook with insane amount of depictions of naked women? Idk, I find it strange.Ĭonceptually the first and the last part seem almost exactly like a herbarium book (except the plants are drawn) - there is an effort to show the roots etc,so whoever drew them had to have pluck them from the ground and examined. However, given how shitty the drawings are I find it very unlikely it would be his, unless he perhaps used his right hand to draw and a left hand to write. Something about it also hits me as a conlang that is a constructed language, which quite possibly the author was the only speaker and wanted it to remain this way. I've gone through the book and pondered about it and have several thoughts, some are in regards to previous suggestions.Īs a first thing that hit me was "is this scrip LTR?" after a some more it seems that not, but something about it, just didn't sit right with me - then the comment, that it is perhaps a notebook of Leonardo Da Vinci who was left handed make me thing it's possible that if not a LTR language, it was perhaps written by a left handed writer.